📝 How to Craft a Band 6 Mod A Textual Conversations Essay

Your Ultimate Guide to writing a comparative band 6 essay for Module A Textual Conversations. Read along as we break down exactly what the markers are looking for from central ideas to essay structure.

24 days ago • 5 min read

By Manoj Arachige

💡

Ever wondered what separates a Band 6 essay from a Band 5? It’s not about sounding smart—it’s about crafting a structured, nuanced response that reflects a deep understanding of textual conversations, context, and comparative analysis. This guide breaks down everything from resonances and dissonances to essay structure and editing, helping you write a Mod A essay that ticks all the markers’ boxes.

🔍 What Are HSC Markers Looking For in Module A?

In Module A, HSC English markers are looking for your considered personal perspective. This means your essay needs to demonstrate:

Resonances: Shared themes, values, and motifs between the paired texts.
Dissonances: Differences where the newer ("child") text reframes, critiques, or diverges from the older ("parent") text.

Use these to analyse the textual conversation—how the two texts interact with each other—and explain how this shapes meaning, reflects context, and informs your personal interpretation.

But where should you start?

KIS Academics connects you with expert English tutors who’ve been through it all and know exactly what markers are looking for. Whether it’s brainstorming an idea, perfecting your metaphors, or reviewing your final draft—we’ve got your back.

🎯 Book a FREE trial lesson today and let’s take your writing to the next level.

🎯 Step 1: Develop a Strong, Adaptable Thesis

A great essay starts with a strong thesis. This thesis should:

Directly engage with the essay question
Be conceptual and flexible
Address both texts in a comparative framework

Start by brainstorming your own unique take on your paired texts. Then, craft a succinct thesis that can be tailored to different essay questions without becoming too general. Avoid memorising one full essay—this limits adaptability.

To prepare:

Brainstorm different thesis angles using key terms from the Module A rubric
Practice creating 5-minute essay plans in response to past HSC questions
Focus on answering the question, not just showing off knowledge

🧠 Step 2: Embed Contextual Analysis into Every Argument

Context is everything in Module A. Strong analysis is always grounded in:

The context of composition: What influenced the author’s choices?
Your context as a responder: How does your perspective shape your reading?

Example:

"The two perspectives thus resonate in a Postmodernist dissection of self to reveal that Plath could only be liberated from her father and other patriarchal forces through the purging of her physical body, ultimately seen in her death."

This sentence clearly integrates theme, context, and personal insight—all in one analysis.

Tips:

Group quotes by theme, value, or perspective
Choose quotes with clear techniques (e.g. motifs, allusions, intertextuality)
Always connect evidence to form, context, and personal interpretation

🧱 Step 3: Structure Your Essay for Clarity and Comparison

There are two effective ways to structure your Mod A essay: Divided and Integrated. Each can earn a Band 6 if executed well.

🧩 Divided Structure

Use four paragraphs to explore two main themes
Discuss one text per paragraph (e.g. A then B, A then B)
Easier for depth but may require more explicit comparative linking

Divided Structure Example:

Para 1: Theme A in Text 1
Para 2: Theme A in Text 2 (+ comparative link)
Para 3: Theme B in Text 1
Para 4: Theme B in Text 2 (+ comparative link)

🔗 Integrated Structure

Use three paragraphs, each analysing both texts together
Easier to emphasise comparison but harder to analyse in depth

Integrated Structure Example:

Para 1: Theme A in Text 1 & 2 (comparative)
Para 2: Theme B in Text 1 & 2 (comparative)
Para 3: Theme C in Text 1 & 2 (comparative)

The second is an integrated structure. This uses three themes to create three paragraphs that include equally weighted evidence from both texts. For most students, this makes framing the directly comparative nature of Module A easier and allows for a more seamless textual conversation to emerge in support of your thesis. This means you can avoid restating prior arguments, but tackling two texts can still make paragraphs chunky, leading to shallow analysis for the sake of brevity. If you stick to a clear structure like the one below, this won’t be an issue.

Both structures have band six potential, so long as they are packed with quality analysis that is embedded in context, filled with consistent links and interacts with the question.